|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
546
   |
Posted - 2014.04.20 11:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:That post says nothing, we need siphon units that target raw materials so POS owners can protect moon goo with worthless reactions. There is no point in CCP introducing broken content, the last patches have all been about fixing content so why have they now introduced broken siphon units?
We need.
You mean to say "I need".
Why are you so butthurt about them being smart enough to counter your attempt? |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
548
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 11:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
What is smart about having broken content? Why even introduce siphon units in the first place if they are not going to work as intended. Hopefully we will get some dev clarification on the introduction of units that can ignore reactions allowing us to steal what we want.
You are not answering my question.
It is not broken, just because they outsmart you.
Why are you butthurt about them countering your attempt to steal from them? |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
550
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 11:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
What is smart about having broken content? Why even introduce siphon units in the first place if they are not going to work as intended. Hopefully we will get some dev clarification on the introduction of units that can ignore reactions allowing us to steal what we want.
What makes it broken? Valuable POS harvest such as high end moon goo can be protected by running worthless or cheap reactions. The Siphon unit always steals from the last item in a chain, so as long as the pos owner runs a worthless reaction on the end the siphon unit can not steal the valuable material. Introducing a siphon unit that steals only raw material will end this exploit. I was just looking for dev clarification for a time scale on the fix.
Oh, so now it's an exploit, because they outsmart you?
What about the fact that they run "worthless reactions" now,
because of you trying to steal stuff from them? |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
550
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 11:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
He doesn't care if the units are broken.
"It's an exploit when the others use it to their advantage." |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
551
|
Posted - 2014.04.20 11:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
TL;DR:
Because POS owners switched reactions,
he lost the magnifying glass making his thingy look bigger.
Now he's butthurt about them laughing at him,
so he blames CCP and calls it an exploit that they
simply aren't doing what he want them to do.
He doesn't actually give an explanation why it is broken,
but believes he is entitled to steal everything and anything from them
and that it has to have value he wants to have.
Conclusion:
<-> ... Actual size.
Case closed. |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
616
|
Posted - 2014.04.21 21:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Personally, I hope they introduce a siphon that can steal from complex reactors.  They should introduce a siphon that tractors autopiloting pods ...
... and traps them, until the player returns to the keyboard.
And with this post, I have seven in a row.
Soon I'll own the front page! |
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
695
|
Posted - 2014.04.22 21:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:
What is smart about having broken content? Why even introduce siphon units in the first place if they are not going to work as intended. Hopefully we will get some dev clarification on the introduction of units that can ignore reactions allowing us to steal what we want.
You are not answering my question. It is not broken, just because they outsmart you. Why are you butthurt about them countering your attempt to steal from them? I think hes complaining that there's no counterplay against their counterplay. Feel free to correct me if there is.
I can't, but I don't see the issue.
Anyhow, looking at Ramonas and Salvos posts,
I see a love story in the making. xD
"My Favourite Nerdling GÖÑ" - Marsha Mellow
|
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 23:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:The questions everyone should be asking is:
Why was the siphon changed from targeting just moon goo to include reactions as well? What was the motive behind this change?
POS in highsec everywhere, removal of standing requirements?
################################
|
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
782
|
Posted - 2014.04.23 23:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:The questions everyone should be asking is:
Why was the siphon changed from targeting just moon goo to include reactions as well? What was the motive behind this change? POS in highsec everywhere, removal of standing requirements? All high sec moons are barren. Even if they are not, you can't anchor mining arrays in 0.4 space and higher. So it has nothing to do with high sec. Hint: Who, that is not CCP, has design influence?
Tinfoil on.
The CSM.
The Goons.
Tinfoil off.
Conspiracy theories get threads locked for rumour mongering.
################################
|
Solecist Project
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
783
|
Posted - 2014.04.24 00:43:00 -
[10] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:There is nothing I said that is a rumor. You still owe us a proper explanation,
given that I have answered your question. :p
################################
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|